Tag Archives: QA

Firefox Desktop automation goals Q1 2016

As promised in my last blog posts I don’t want to only blog about the goals from last quarters, but also about planned work and what’s currently in progress. So this post will be the first one which will shed some light into my active work.

First lets get started with my goals for this quarter.

Execute firefox-ui-tests in TaskCluster

Now that our tests are located in mozilla-central, mozilla-aurora, and mozilla-beta we want to see them run on a check-in basis including try. Usually you will setup Buildbot jobs to get your wanted tasks running. But given that the build system will be moved to Taskcluster in the next couple of months, we decided to start directly with the new CI infrastructure.

So how will this look like and how will mozmill-ci cope with that? For the latter I can say that we don’t want to run more tests as we do right now. This is mostly due to our limited infrastructure I have to maintain myself. Having the needs to run firefox-ui-tests for each check-in on all platforms and even for try pushes, would mean that we totally exceed the machine capacity. Therefore we continue to use mozmill-ci for now to test nightly and release builds for en-US but also a couple of other locales. This might change later this year when mozmill-ci can be replaced by running all the tasks in Taskcluster.

Anyway, for now my job is to get the firefox-ui-tests running in Taskcluster once a build task has been finished. Although that this can only be done for Linux right now it shouldn’t matter that much given that nothing in our firefox-puppeteer package is platform dependent so far. Expanding testing to other platforms should be trivial later on. For now the primary goal is to see test results of our tests in Treeherder and letting developers know what needs to be changed if e.g. UI changes are causing a regression for us.

If you are interested in more details have a look at bug 1237550.

Documentation of firefox-ui-tests and mozmill-ci

We are submitting our test results to Treeherder for a while and are pretty stable. But the jobs are still listed as Tier-3 and are not taking care of by sheriffs. To reach the Tier-2 level we definitely need proper documentation for our firefox-ui-tests, and especially mozmill-ci. In case of test failures or build bustage the sheriffs have to know what’s necessary to do.

Now that the dust caused by all the refactoring and moving the firefox-ui-tests to hg.mozilla.org settles a bit, we want to start to work more with contributors again. To allow an easy contribution I will create various project documentation which will show how to get started, and how to submit patches. Ultimately I want to see a quarter of contribution project for our firefox-ui-tests around mid this year. Lets see how this goes…

More details about that can be found on bug 1237552.

Automation Survey Follow-up

As promised in my last post about the automation survey results I wanted to come up with a follow-up to clarify our next steps in being more open for our activities, discussions, and also quarterly goals. Sorry, that it has been taken a bit longer but end of the quarter and especially the year is mostly packed with stuff to finish up. Also the all-hands work week in Orlando beginning of December hold me off from doing a lot real work.

So lets get started with the mailing list topic first. As we have seen most people kinda like to get our news via the automation mailing list. But given the low usage of that list in the last months it was a bit surprising. Nearly all the time I sent emails myself (not to count in Travis results). That means we want to implement a change here. From now on we won’t use the mozilla.dev.automation list but instead utilize the mozilla.tools list. Also because this is the recommended list for the Engineering Productivity team we are all part of, and discussions will reach a larger audience. So please subscribe to this list via Google Groups or Email.

For status updates about our current activities we started to use standu.ps last quarter. It seems to work pretty well for us and everyone else is welcome to also post updates to our automation project section. If you are interested in those updates then read through that list or simply subscribe the page in your RSS reader.

Please also note that from now on there will be no Firefox Automation reports anymore. Instead I will reduce the amount of different contents, and only write about projects I worked on. So keep an eye out to not miss those!

Results of the Firefox Automation Survey

November 23rd I blogged about the active survey covering the information flow inside our Firefox Automation team. This survey was open until November 30th and I thank everyone of the participants which have taken the time to get it filled out. In the following you can find the results:

Most of the contributors who are following our activities are with Mozilla for the last 3 years. Whereby half of them joined less than a year ago. There is also a 1:1 split between volunteers and paid staff members. This is most likely because of the low number of responses, but anyway increasing the number of volunteers is certainly something we want to follow-up on in the next months.

The question about which communication channel is preferred to get the latest news got answered with 78% for the automation mailing list. I feel that this is a strange result given that we haven’t really used that list for active discussions or similar in the past months. But that means we should put more focus on the list. Beside that also 55% listening our activities on Bugzilla via component watchers. I would assume that those people are mostly our paid staff who kinda have to follow each others work regarding reviews, needinfo requests, and process updates. 44% of all read our blog posts on the Mozilla A-Team Planet. So we will put more focus in the future to both blog posts and discussions on the mailing list.

More than half of our followers check for updates at least once a day. So when we get started with interesting discussions I would expect good activity throughout the day.

44% of all feel less informed about our current activities. Another 33% answered this question with ‘Mostly’. So it’s a clear indication what I already thought and which clearly needs action on our side to be more communicative. Doing this might also bring more people into our active projects, so mentoring would be much more valuable and time-effective as handling any drive-by projects which we cannot fully support.

A request for the type of news we should do more is definitely for latest changes and code landings from contributors. This will ensure people feel recognized and contributors will also know each others work, and see the effectiveness in regards of our project goals. But also discussions about various automation related topics (as mentioned already above) are highly wanted. Other topics like quarterly goals and current status updates are also wanted and we will see how we can do that. We might be able to fold those general updates into the Engineering Productivity updates which are pushed out twice a month via the A-Team Planet.

Also there is a bit of confusion about the Firefox Automation team and how it relates to the Engineering Productivity team (formerly A-Team). Effectively we are all part of the latter, and the “virtual” Automation team has only been created when we got shifted between the A-Team and QA-Team forth and back. This will not happen anymore, so we agreed on to get rid of this name.

All in all there are some topics which will need further discussions. I will follow-up with another blog post soon which will show off our plans for improvements and how we want to work to make it happen.

Survey about sharing information inside the Firefox Automation team

Within the Firefox Automation team we were suffering a bit in sharing information about our work over the last couple of months. That mainly happened because I was alone and not able to blog more often than once in a quarter. The same applies to our dev-automation mailing list which mostly only received emails from Travis CI with testing results.

Given that the team has been increased to 4 people now (beside me this is Maja Frydrychowicz, Syd Polk, and David Burns, we want to be more open again and also trying to get more people involved into our projects. To ensure that we do not make use of the wrong communication channels – depending where most of our readers are – I have setup a little survey. It will only take you a minute to go through but it will help us a lot to know more about the preferences of our automation geeks. So please take that little time and help us.

The survey can be found here and is open until end of November 2015:

https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/528WYYJ

Thank you a lot!

mozdownload 1.18 released

Today we have released mozdownload 1.18 to PyPI. The reason why I think it’s worth a blog post is that with this version we finally added support for a sane API. With it available using the mozdownload code in your own script is getting much easier. So there is no need to instantiate a specific scraper anymore but a factory scraper is doing all the work depending on the options it gets.

Here some examples:

from mozdownload import FactoryScraper
scraper = FactoryScraper('release', version='40.0.3', locale='de')
scraper.download()
from mozdownload import FactoryScraper
scraper = FactoryScraper('candidate', version='41.0b9', platform='win32')
scraper.download()
from mozdownload import FactoryScraper
scraper = FactoryScraper('daily', branch='mozilla-aurora')
scraper.download()

If you are using mozdownload via its API you can also easily get the remote URL and the local filename:

from mozdownload import FactoryScraper
scraper = FactoryScraper('daily', branch='mozilla-aurora')
print scraper.url
print scraper.filename

Hereby the factory class is smart enough to only select those passed-in options which are appropriate for the type of scraper. If you have to download different types of builds you will enjoy that feature given that only the scraper type has to be changed and all other options could be still passed-in.

We hope that this new feature will help you by integrating mozdownload into your own project. There is no need anymore by using its command line interface through a subprocess call.

The complete changelog can be found here.

Firefox Automation report – Q1 2015

As you may have noticed I was not able to come up with status reports of the Firefox Automation team during the whole last quarter. I feel sad about it, but there was simply no time to keep up with those blog posts. Even now I’m not sure how often I will be able to blog. So maybe I will aim to do it at least once a quarter or if possible once a month.

You may ask how it comes? The answer is simple. Our team faced some changes and finally a massive loss of core members. Which means from the former 6 people only myself are remaining. Since end of February all 5 former team members from Softvision are no longer participating in any of the maintained projects. Thanks to all of them for the great help over all the last months and years! But every project we own is now on my own shoulders. And this is kinda hell of work with downsides like not being able to do as many reviews as I want for side projects. One positive thing at least was that I got pulled back into the A-Team at the same time. With that move I’m once more closer again to all the people who care about the basics of all test infrastructure at Mozilla. I feel back home.

So what have I done the whole last quarter… First, it was always the ongoing daily work for maintaining our Mozmill CI system. This was usually a job for a dedicated person all the last months. The amount of work can sometimes eat up a whole day. Especially if several regressions have been found or incompatible changes in Firefox have been landed. Seeing my deliverables for Q1 it was clear that we have to cut down the time to spent on those failures. As result we started to partially skip tests which were failing. There was no time to get any of those fixed. Happily the latest version of Mozmill is still working kinda nicely so no other work had to be dedicated for this project.

Most of my time during the last quarter I actually had to spent on Marionette, especially building up wrapper scripts for being able to use Marionette as test framework for Firefox Desktop. This was a kinda large change for us but totally important in terms of maintenance burden and sustainability. The code base of Mozmill is kinda outdated and features like Electrolysis (e10s) will totally break it. Given that a rewrite of the test framework is too cost-intensive the decision has been made to transition our Mozmill tests over to Marionette. Side-effect was that a lot of missing features had to be implemented in Marionette to bring it at a level as what Mozmill offers. Thanks for the amazing work goes to Andrew Halberstadt, David Burns, Jonathan Griffin, and especially Chris Manchester.

For the new UI driven tests for Firefox Desktop we created the firefox-ui-tests repository at Github. We decided on that name to make it clear to which product the tests belong to, and also to get rid of any relationship to the underling test framework name. This repository contains the harness extensions around Marionette, a separate puppeteer library for back-end and UI modules, and last but not least the tests themselves. As goal for Q1 we had to get the basics working including the full set of remote security tests, and most important the update tests. A lot of help on the security tests we got from Barbara Miller our intern from December to March. She did great amount of work here, and also assisted other community members in getting their code done. Finally we got all the security tests converted.

My own focus beside the harness pieces were the update tests. Given the complete refactoring of those Mozmill tests we were able to easily port them over to Marionette. We tried to keep the class structure as is, and only did enhancements where necessary. Here Bob Silverberg helped with two big chunks of work which I’m gladly thankful about! Thanks a lot! With all modules in-place I finally converted the update tests and got them running for each version of Firefox down to 38.0, which will be the next ESR release and kinda important to be tested with Marionette. For stability and ease of contribution we added support for Travis CI to our new repository. It helps us a lot with reviews of patches from community members, and they also can see immediately if changes they have done are working as expected.

The next big chunk of work will be to get those tests running in Mozmill CI (to be renamed) and the test reporting to use Treeherder. Also we want to get our update tests for Firefox releases executed by the RelEng system, to further reduce the amount of time for signoffs from QE. About this work I will talk more in my next blog post. So please stay tuned.

Meeting Details

If you are interested in further details and discussions you might also want to have a look at the meeting agendas, the video recordings, and notes from the Firefox Automation meetings. Please note that since end of February we no longer host a meeting due to the low attendance and other meetings like the A-team ones, where I have to report my status.

Firefox Automation report – week 41/42 2014

In this post you can find an overview about the work happened in the Firefox Automation team during week 41 and 42.

With the beginning of October we also have some minor changes in responsibilities of tasks. While our team members from SoftVision mainly care about any kind of Mozmill tests related requests and related CI failures, Henrik is doing all the rest including the framework and the maintenance of Mozmill CI.

Highlights

With the support for all locales testing in Mozmill-CI for any Firefox beta and final release, Andreea finished her blacklist patch. With that we can easily mark locales not to be tested, and get rid of the long white-list entries.

We spun up our first OS X 10.10 machine in our staging environment of Mozmill CI for testing the new OS version. We hit a couple of issues, especially some incompatibilities with mozrunner, which need to be fixed first before we can get started in running our tests on 10.10.

In the second week of October Teodor Druta joined the Softvision team, and he will assist all the others with working on Mozmill tests.

But we also had to fight a lot with Flash crashes on our testing machines. So we have seen about 23 crashes on Windows machines per day. And that all with the regular release version of Flash, which we re-installed because of a crash we have seen before was fixed. But the healthy period did resist long, and we had to revert back to the debug version without the protect mode. Lets see for how long we have to keep the debug version active.

Individual Updates

For more granular updates of each individual team member please visit our weekly team etherpad for week 41 and week 42.

Meeting Details

If you are interested in further details and discussions you might also want to have a look at the meeting agenda, the video recording, and notes from the Firefox Automation meetings of week 41 and week 42.

Firefox Automation report – week 9/10 2014

In this post you can find an overview about the work happened in the Firefox Automation team during week 9 and 10. I for myself was a week on vacation. A bit of relaxing before the work on the TPS test framework should get started.

Highlights

In preparation to run Mozmill tests for Firefox Metro in our Mozmill-CI system, Andreea has started to get support for Metro builds and appropriate tests included.

With the help from Henrik we got Mozmill 2.0.6 released. It contains a helpful fix for waitForPageLoad(), which let you know about the page being loaded and its status in case of a failure. This might help us to nail down the intermittent failures when loading remote and even local pages. But the most important part of this release is indeed the support of mozcrash. Even that we cannot have a full support yet due to missing symbol files for daily builds on ftp.mozilla.org, we can at least show that a crash was happening during a testrun, and let the user know about the local minidump files.

Individual Updates

For more granular updates of each individual team member please visit our weekly team etherpad for week 9 and week 10.

Meeting Details

If you are interested in further details and discussions you might also want to have a look at the meeting agenda, the video recording, and notes from the Firefox Automation meetings of week 9 and week 10.

Double-check to disable Firefox Sync when doing a regression test to not loose important profile data

Yesterday I was doing a regression test for Firefox to determine the changeset which brought in a very annoying behavior into Aurora builds. Therefore I copied my profile to not destroy my original profile data, and was working on that copy. All was working fine and I was able to reduce the whole profile to only the sessionstore.js and prefs.js files.

The evil awakening came today morning when I tried to log into a website via my personal profile. By surprise the user name and password hasn’t been filled in automatically, and a check for the saved passwords have revealed that NONE are stored anymore! All were gone forever.

After some thoughts I figured out that sync was the problem here, because I missed to disconnect it in the copied profile. So after I have deleted the signons.sqlite and other files it also removed all the information from my sync account, which got distributed to all my other machines too. So on each of them the passwords are gone.

And if that isn’t bad enough, the backup tool on my Ubuntu machine had a hick-up lately and deleted all the old backup files on the backup drive. Not sure how that have come, but with that I completely lost all my stored passwords, and other synced data. :(

So a warning for everyone who is doing regression tests for Firefox and has Sync enabled: Please do NOT forget to disconnect Sync for the testing profile and double-check that it has been turned off.

New ‘in-qa-testsuite’ flag available for Mozilla QA driven test frameworks

Given the importance of automation in QA the Automation Development team had a discussion lately how to improve tracking of QA covered automated testcases in Bugzilla. In the past we haven’t had a way to mark code in bugs for new features or regression fixes as being covered by Mozmill automation.

As we have agreed on it is important to scale our visibility and make it easier for both developers and QA to determine if a feature has automated tests, whether in the tree, in the Mozmill tests repository, or any other framework we would have to create in the future. A whiteboard entry didn’t make much sense for us, and to better align with the existent ‘in-testsuite’ flag, we decided on the ‘in-qa-testsuite‘ flag.

So if you think that a feature needs coverage by Mozmill, make sure to set this flag and assign myself (use “:whimboo” as name). I will then ensure the request will be handled appropriately and the test gets implemented.

Further documentation on automation frameworks and this flag will be available soon. I will blog about once it is ready.